![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> This is all certainly doable, but it leaves me with one concern: there > will be no signal to external module maintainers that the change needs > to be made. So, beyond doubt, quite a few of them will just continue to > be shipped unfixed - and they will still run. If any of them actually > *need* the BKL, something awful may happen to somebody someday. I now have a large patch and my full x86-32 build tree building without ->ioctl() in file_operations. Its a 350K patch and took all day so I'll begin splitting it out and sending chunks to tree maintainers. Alan | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-22 22:37 [W:0.666 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||