lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CFD: (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jesper Juhl wrote:

a couple minor corrections

>
> In some cases it's easy; if you are working on a very specific area
> like the real-time properties of the kernel, then the experimental -tr
> tree is probably what you want to develop against. In most cases

here you mean the -rt tree, not the -tr tree

> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some
> criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very

here you mean NACK not ACK

David Lang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-22 07:31    [W:0.104 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site