Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 May 2008 22:34:07 -0700 (PDT) | From | david@lang ... | Subject | Re: CFD: (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) |
| |
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jesper Juhl wrote:
a couple minor corrections
> > In some cases it's easy; if you are working on a very specific area > like the real-time properties of the kernel, then the experimental -tr > tree is probably what you want to develop against. In most cases
here you mean the -rt tree, not the -tr tree
> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some > criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very
here you mean NACK not ACK
David Lang
| |