lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectiput() in reclaim context
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 10:15:32 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:28:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> > > It's more than efficiency. There are lots and lots of things we cannot
> > > do in direct-reclaim context.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > c) Cannot run iput(). Or at least, we couldn't five or six years
> > > ago. afaik nobody has investigated whether the situation is now
> > > better or worse.

I happened to notice your remark in the buffer heads defrag thread.
Do you remember what that limitation was about?

Because just a few months ago I discovered a shmem race which I fixed
by doing igrab+iput in shmem_writepage, in the reclaim context. Feeling
guilty now: I'd better investigate, but would welcome a starting pointer.

(If I'm lucky, it'll be that the generic code in vmscan.c cannot
use iput, but particular filesystems might themselves be safe to.)

Thanks,
Hugh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-21 19:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site