lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CFD: (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)
On Wed, 21 May 2008 08:09:39 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:32:06AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:50:37AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Oh, what a marvellous way to encourage new contributors that was. Thank
> > > you so much.
> > >
> > > For the record: Al speaks only for himself and a lack of expressed
> > > disagrement from others should not be taken as agreement.
> >
> > But I'd like to second the opinion. This is getting a little too far.
> > We should rather try to at least enforce very basic standards a lot of
> > the crap shoved in doesn't follow instead of wanking around about exact
> > placement of whitespaces.
>
> The real question is whether people who are wanking about whitespace
> and spelling fixes in comments will graduate to writing real, useful
> patches. If they won't, there's no point to encouraging them.
>

Guys, get a clue. It doesn't matter what that person did. It is the
effect upon *all* other potential developers which is so damaging here.
Not upon this individual.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-21 19:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans