lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Make
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Like this ? (I don't have a -mm handy, so guessed based on
> > mm-commits mail, patch uncompiled, but should dtrt if I understood
> > your diff correctly)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
> > index 4350ba9..d8dee53 100644
> > --- a/lib/list_debug.c
> > +++ b/lib/list_debug.c
> > @@ -21,16 +21,14 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
> > struct list_head *next)
> > {
> > if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev
> > should be "
> > + WARN(1, "list_add corruption. next->prev should be
> > " "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
> > prev, next->prev, next);
> > - BUG();
> > }
>
> I think Arjan meant like
>
> WARN(next->prev != prev,
> "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
> "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
> prev, next->prev, next);
>
> without any "if()" statement at all.

Dave...what Linus said ;)


would be nice to get WARN() into mainline soon... ;)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-20 18:19    [W:0.133 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site