[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] x86: xsave/xrstor support, ucontext_t extensions

> The de-facto ABI for signal delivery and sigreturn is unfortunately
> based on fairly fixed-layout structs on the stack (sigframes). The
> only flexibility there that I've found is the sigcontext's fpstate
> pointer which allows the fpstate to be located elsewhere.

One sure 100% compatible way would be to only change the signal layout once
the application used anything that needs XSAVE/XRSTOR. But implementing
that would be likely complicated and I'm not sure it's worth it.

I don't remember that much breakage when the FXSAVE support was
introduced on i386. That already changed these data structures.

> Another idea is that marking non-siginfo sigframes could be done
> by adding a sys_xsave_sigreturn() and letting those sigframes
> have a return address pointing to a vsyscall that invokes this
> new syscall.

That sounds easy enough. x86-64 right now doesn't use signal vsyscalls but
there is no principle reason it can't.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-19 17:11    [W:0.167 / U:1.928 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site