lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 16 May 2008 10:40:59 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [BISECTED] Lots of "rescheduling IPIs" in powertop
* Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> wrote:

> > > Recap: powertop shows between 200-400 wakeups/second with the 
> > > description "<kernel IPI>: Rescheduling interrupts" when all 
> > > processors have load (e.g. I need to run two busy-loops on my 
> > > 2-CPU system for this to show up).
> > 
> > ok, could you try the fix below? It was a mistake to make mwait use 
> > dependent on power considerations - on a desktop CPU it is unlikely 
> > to use more power than a simple HLT - and the IPIs are extra 
> > scheduling latency and extra power used.
> 
> It depends on the CPU. For AMD CPUs that support MWAIT this is wrong. 
> Family 0x10 and 0x11 CPUs will enter C1 on HLT. Powersavings then 
> depend on a clock divisor and current Pstate of the core.
> 
> If all cores of a processor are in halt state (C1) the processor can 
> enter the C1E (C1 enhanced) state. If mwait is used this will never 
> happen.
> 
> Thus HLT saves more power than MWAIT here.
> 
> It might be best to switch off the mwait flag for these AMD CPU 
> families like it was introduced with commit 
> f039b754714a422959027cb18bb33760eb8153f0 (x86: Don't use MWAIT on AMD 
> Family 10)

agreed, that looks like the cleanest solution. Could you please send a 
patch for that, ontop of my patch?

	Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-16 10:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2008