[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB
    On Thu, 15 May 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

    > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:05:35AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > > Thanks for using the slab statistics. I wish I had these numbers for the
    > > TPC benchmark. That would allow us to understand what is going on while it
    > > is running.
    > Hang on, you want slab statistics for the TPC run? You didn't tell me
    > that. We're trying to gather oprofile data (and having trouble because
    > the machine crashes when we start using oprofile -- this is with the git
    > tree you/pekka put together for us to test).

    Well we talked about this when you send me the test program. I just
    thought that it would be logical to do the same for the real case.

    Details of the crash please?

    You could just start with 2.6.25.X which already contains the slab

    Also re: the test program since pinning a process does increase the
    performance by orders of magnitude. Are you sure that the application was
    properly tuned for an 8p configuration? Pinning is usually not necessary
    for lower numbers of processors because the scheduler thrashing effect is
    less of an issue. If the test program is an accurate representation of
    the TP-C benchmark then you can drastically increase its performance by
    doing the same to the real test.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-15 20:01    [W:0.020 / U:6.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site