![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008 19:00:12 -0500> "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com> wrote: > > But I'm still reverting the v9fs tree due to > > git-v9fs is causing i386 allmodconfig failures: > > net/9p/trans_fd.o: In function `init_module': > trans_fd.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module' > net/9p/mod.o:mod.c:(.init.text+0x0): first defined here > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: size of symbol `init_module' changed from 27 in net/9p/mod.o to 128 in net/9p/trans_fd.o > Okay, clearly I'm doing something wrong. I've tried the allmodconfig on my local sandbox and its fine. When I look to see if there is still a module_init in net/9p/trans_fd on kernel.org via gitweb, I can't find it. (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ericvh/v9fs.git;a=blob;f=net/9p/trans_fd.c;h=4507f744f44e527cc140b6b5601e556c10bfd361;hb=v9fs-devel) Are you pulling from my v9fs-devel tree or is --mm switched over to pull from linux-next or something? -eric | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-15 04:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||