lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 15 May 2008 00:21:50 +0200
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:>> The goal less being to get rid of BKL in old drivers, but not 
>> requiring BKL in new drivers. Basically all BKL assumptions
>> in interfaces really should go.> > No, we really do want to get rid of BKL in old drivers too. Or at least in 
> the interfaces.

In the interfaces definitely yes and all subsystems should have their
own lock_kernel calls, but why in the old drivers? For those it's very
unlikely they are used on any SMP system anyways (e.g. anything
depending on CONFIG_ISA) or if they do only on 2 CPU systems.

Of course if you can find someone to do the work it wouldn't be
bad, just wouldn't seem like a particularly useful investment of time to
me.

Also it would be bad if the people who did such conversions didn't
actually test it and that's a great danger with many old drivers because
nearly nobody has the hardware (and if they do it won't be in a SMP system)

-Andi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-15 00:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008