![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > > I am saying that it was merged too early, and that there are points that > > should have been addressed before the driver got merged. > > > > Get it submitted for review to linux-kernel. > > Give the maintainers some time to incorporate all comments. > > Even one month later it could still have made it into 2.6.25. > > > > The only problem with my suggestion is that it's currently pretty random > > whether someone takes the time to review such a driver on linux-kernel. > > Now, I do agree that we could/should have some more process in general. I > really _would_ like to have a process in place that basically says: > > - everything must have gone through lkml at least once What about 'must go through lkml at least once *outside the merge window*'. Or is it just me? During the merge window, I'm totally overloaded by all those patches going in and related lkml traffic... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-14 16:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||