![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:21:29 -0700 > Is MIPS really a problem? The value is 0x80. 128 protocol types should > be enough. Even if not, there is no reason why the numbers should be > consecutive. It's easy enough to skip over a bit. I.e., after procotol > 0x7f the next one would be 0x100. Indeed, MIPS looks good. > And PA seems to have gotten O_NONBLOCK wrong. SPARC does it right AFAICS. I agree. But that value is compiled into every parisc binary out there, limiting what we can do about it in the short term. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-13 06:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||