![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:25 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Gianni Tedesco a écrit : > > > > > > Nope, exact same bad paging request in kernel mode... probably the bug > > is something deep in oprofile then? > > > Hum... Are you using oprofile as a module or statically included in kernel ? Yes module > Current module loader only allocates percpu room by examining > ".data.percpu" section and should be augmented to also look at > ".data.percpu.shared_aligned" > Or, change DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() for modules (to use > ".data.percpu" only) > > Anyway, with the per_cpu conversion of cpu_buffer, we dont need to > request cache_line alignment anymore > > [PATCH] oprofile: Dont request cache line alignment for cpu_buffer Nice theory, but with percpu + this patch, it still leads to the same BUG trap :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-13 13:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||