Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 May 2008 21:21:29 -0700 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 18/18] flag parameters: check magic constants |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
David Miller wrote: > You'll need to handle MIPS and PARISC as well, as they have > similar conflicts.
Is MIPS really a problem? The value is 0x80. 128 protocol types should be enough. Even if not, there is no reason why the numbers should be consecutive. It's easy enough to skip over a bit. I.e., after procotol 0x7f the next one would be 0x100.
And PA seems to have gotten O_NONBLOCK wrong. SPARC does it right AFAICS.
- -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIKRdJ2ijCOnn/RHQRAovKAKDFz2ZJ0E2XYVu5Qn8fME+ieZZopwCgmH4D ldfvNrhK8LdvjZzNPViILV0= =Z9Dj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |