![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:22 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:33:20AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > To make the testing faster, I changed some parameters of volanoMark. > > The result of 2.6.26-rc1(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y) is about 2%~3% less than the one of > > 2.6.25 (CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y). A quick update: With 2.6.26-rc2 (CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y), volanoMark result on my 8-core stoakley is about 10% worse than the one of 2.6.26-rc1. > > This for confirming my observation. It seems much better than the 50% regression > reported earlier (with 2.6.26-rc1 and CONFIG_USER_SCHED). > > Ideally we should get same results with CONFIG_USER_SCHED also (in > 2.6.26-rc1). That needs some work in load balance code. Till that is > tackled, IMHO we can retain all the current code by either: > > 1. Disabling CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED (or better) > 2. Enable CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED and CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED > > Ingo/Peter, What's your opinion? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-05-12 07:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||