Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 12 May 2008 13:39:21 +0200 | | From | Oliver Hartkopp <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Kernel naming convention in the merge phase |
| |
Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 11:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > >> Most of the robots don't have access to git. >> >> >>> For me a 2.6.25-gitX looks like a snapshot that leads to a 2.6.25.1 and >>> _not_ to a 2.6.26-rc1. >>> >> Tough. It's a naming convention quite old (we had -bk before -git, too.) >> > > What about a -rc0 as the first commit after a release? Will help a lot > automatic installing scripts... > >
Yes - this was also my intention. I don't have any preferences if the first commit after a release is named -merge or -rc0. But it should point out that we're leaving the former stable release.
Regards, Oliver
|  |