Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 2008 16:21:16 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem |
| |
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:42:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[snip] > Is there some vaguely maintainable workaround we can do? If the problem > only affects completely-empty weak functions then we could put something in > them to make them non-empty?
My memory is a tiny bit hazy (it was a while ago), but no, it's not just empty functions (again, I _think_ I hit it with a generic vs arch weak function).
-- Tom Rini
| |