lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 9 Apr 2008 21:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
FromGuennadi Liakhovetski <>
SubjectRe: gpio patches in mmotm
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Hello Guennadi,
> 
> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >                      My original proposal was to introduce just one 
> > NO_GPIO macro to test against, however, David nicely managed to persuade 
> > me, that the gpio_is_valid approach is better. Unfortunately, I cannot 
> > argument as nicely as he did, maybe looking through his emails in LKML 
> > archives will help you:-)
> I'm unable to find these mails.  (Using gmane, looking for mails by
> David matching gpio_is_valid, the oldest post I can find is
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/637654.)
> 
> Can you please point out the discussion in the archives?

See also

http://marc.info/?t=120179335100005&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=120267097400002&r=1&w=2
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-09 21:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2008