![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello Guennadi, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > My original proposal was to introduce just one > NO_GPIO macro to test against, however, David nicely managed to persuade > me, that the gpio_is_valid approach is better. Unfortunately, I cannot > argument as nicely as he did, maybe looking through his emails in LKML > archives will help you:-) I'm unable to find these mails. (Using gmane, looking for mails by David matching gpio_is_valid, the oldest post I can find is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/637654.) Can you please point out the discussion in the archives? Best regards Uwe -- Uwe Kleine-König, Software Engineer Digi International GmbH Branch Breisach, Küferstrasse 8, 79206 Breisach, Germany Tax: 315/5781/0242 / VAT: DE153662976 / Reg. Amtsgericht Dortmund HRB 13962 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-09 08:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||