lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING


    On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
    >
    > We only need this flag as an implicit parameter to the arch dependent do_signal()
    > which we can't call directly, and thus it must imply TIF_SIGPENDING, and it
    > is not valid after do_signal() (should be cleared). This all looks like
    > ERESTART_ magic, why should we add something else ?

    I think you're right. I didn't look at the actual code-paths, but my gut
    feel says "yes, TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK should actually have been
    -ERESTARTSIGRESTORE". That sounds like the right thing to do.

    Linus


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-08 16:57    [W:0.022 / U:9.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site