![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I know. However preempt_count is a little bit inconsistent in such cases > > though. > And? interrupts off beats preempt count anyways. Why did you write the > patch? Was there a (incorrect) warning triggered? Reported at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130 BTW is also mce_init() (called from mce_resume()) guaranteed to run with IRQs off? -- Jiri Kosina | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-08 00:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||