[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0xffffffff
    On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:21:22 -0400 wrote:

    > On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:32:14 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
    > >
    > Been seeing these crop up once in a while - can take hours after a reboot
    > before I see the first one, but once I see one, I'm likely to see more, at
    > a frequency of anywhere from ~5seconds to ~10 minutes between BUG msgs.
    > BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0xffffffff
    > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 #4
    > Call Trace:
    > [<ffffffff8020b2f4>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x74
    > [<ffffffff8022be19>] __schedule_bug+0x5d/0x61
    > [<ffffffff80552aea>] schedule+0x11a/0x9e4
    > [<ffffffff805536ce>] ? preempt_schedule+0x3c/0xaa
    > [<ffffffff802480f1>] ? hrtimer_forward+0x82/0x96
    > [<ffffffff804600a4>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0xd5
    > [<ffffffff8020b2f4>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x74
    > [<ffffffff8020b2e0>] cpu_idle+0xf6/0x10a
    > [<ffffffff80540cb2>] rest_init+0x86/0x8a
    > Eventually, I end up with a basically hung system, and need to alt-sysrq-B.
    > Yes, I know it's tainted, and it's possible the root cause is a self-inflicted
    > buggy module - but the traceback above seems odd. Did some of my code manage
    > to idle the CPU while is_atomic was set, or is the path from cpu_idle on down
    > doing something it shouldn't be?

    I'd say that there's an unlock missing somewhere.

    > (I admit being confused - if my code was the source of the is_atomic error,
    > shouldn't it have been caught on the *previous* call to schedule - the one
    > that ran through all the queues and decided we should invoke idle?

    Sounds sane. Perhaps preempt_count is getting mucked up in interrupt

    iirc there's some toy in either the recently-added tracing code or still in
    the -rt tree which would help find a missed unlock, but I forget what it was.
    Ingo will know...

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-07 08:51    [W:0.023 / U:24.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site