[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 02/10] emm: notifier logic
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > > + rcu_assign_pointer(mm->emm_notifier, e);
    > > + mm_unlock(mm);
    > My mm_lock solution makes all rcu serialization an unnecessary
    > overhead so you should remove it like I already did in #v11. If it
    > wasn't the case, then mm_lock wouldn't be a definitive fix for the
    > race.

    There still could be junk in the cache of one cpu. If you just read the
    new pointer but use the earlier content pointed to then you have a

    So a memory fence / barrier is needed to guarantee that the contents
    pointed to are fetched after the pointer.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-07 07:51    [W:0.018 / U:0.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site