![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 06:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote: > We all had the arguments about 80 columns, so here goes a relax. > Checking for 95 (or perhaps something better?), but of course we > print "80" in the output, because if you happened to get to 95, it's > "really time" to break it. This will reduce the usefulness of checkpatch for those developers who choose to observe an 80-column limit. > This also relaxes the tab doctrine, because spaces DO make sense -- > especially when you view the code with a tab setting of not-8. Non-tab-using code inevitably ends up having a mix of tabs and non-tabs and looks a mess if tabstops are set to anything other than eight. God I wish I had not been cc'ed on this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-06 07:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||