lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    DateSat, 5 Apr 2008 11:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
    FromLinus Torvalds <>
    SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc8-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
    
    On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > 
    > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
    > Subject		: regression: am-utils stopped working in 2.6.25-rc*
    > Submitter	: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
    > Date		: 2008-03-28 15:20 (7 days old)
    > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/28/174
    
    This seems to be a bug in am-utils:
    
    	https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
    
    and while we try very hard to not break existing binaries that assume some 
    old broken kernel behaviour, things like system setup code that is 
    outright buggy is kind of exempt from that rule. So I think in this case 
    it really is a user-level issue.
    
    > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10346
    > Subject		: Linux 2.6.25-rc6: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2510
    > Submitter	: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@unixsol.org>
    > Date		: 2008-03-27 17:29 (8 days old)
    > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/27/246
    
    I wouldn't call this a regression. It's a hard-to-trigger warning that is 
    being debugged. 
    
    			Linus
    
    
    
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-05 21:01    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2008