Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ? | | From | Soeren Sonnenburg <> | | Date | Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:54:28 +0200 | |
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:58 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am wondering whether the change from
>
> /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc:kbd_backlight (2.6.24)
> /sys/devices/platform/applesmc.768/leds/smc::kbd_backlight (2.6.25)
>
> is intentional?
>
> I recognized that it breaks current userspace applications changing the
> keyboard background leds like pommed...
OK it looks like commit 6c152beefbf90579d21afc4f7e075b1f801f9a75 from
Richard Purdie, 'leds: Standardise LED naming scheme' introduced this
change.
Why do we need '::' instead of a single ':' (that would not have broken
things)?
Also sometimes only a single ':' seperator is used like in
corgi:green:mail but e.g. not in clevo::mail ?!
Soeren
|  |