Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:49 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] docbook: fix fatal rapidio yet again (and more to come) |
| |
On Thu, 1 May 2008 08:09:24 +1000 Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes: > > > > Odd. I thought Paul had picked up a docbook RapidIO patch from you in > > > the latest merge round. > > > > > > > Well it's more than "a" patch. The six-week-old patch series is: > > > > rapidio-add-memory-mapping-driver-to-rapidio.patch > > rapidio-add-rapidio-space-allocation-bitmap-arithmetic.patch > > rapidio-add-fsl-rapidio-controller-memory-ops-functions.patch > > rapidio-add-the-rapidio-master-port-maintance-and-doorbell-window-to-space-resources.patch > > rapidio-add-rapidio-proc-fs-for-memory-mapping-debugging.patch > > rapidio-add-the-memory-mapping-support-in-rionet-driver.patch > > rapidio-fix-docbook-references.patch > > rapidio-fix-kernel-doc-problems.patch > > What happened is that you (Andrew) sent them on to me pretty much > unexamined. I took a look at them and dropped one of them because it > created a new /proc file. I asked Kumar to look at them and he had > issues with another three of the patches, and dropping those meant > that all the following ones (including the fix-kernel-doc one) > wouldn't apply, so I dropped them too. I applied the rest and sent > them to Linus. > > > (seems that I forgot to cc Jeff on the rionet change too). > > Yeah. I nearly dropped that one too. I probably should have. :) > > > Oh well. If nobody puts their hand up in the next 24 hours or so I'll just > > send it all in to Linus. > > Please don't. At this stage I think the best thing is for Kumar to > talk to Zhang Wei (they both work for Freescale, so that should be > possible in theory :) and get him to rework the remaining patches as > required for inclusion in 2.6.27.
Just to be clear, the docbook changes shouldn't wait for 2.6.27. There's no need for that.
--- ~Randy
| |