Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:12:45 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 |
| |
Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh >> <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll >>> relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one >> I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa >> showed no real change. > > Worth checking 2.6.24, yes. But you've already made it clear that > you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably) > need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that. >
Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for the regression.
-- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL
| |