Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:57:44 +0200 | | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] fs/block_dev.c:I_BDEV() mustn't be inline | |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:32:17PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:41:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So just removing the inline is simply not acceptable any more, since it
> > just implies total and utter breakage of the compiler. At some point you
> > just have to say: "That is sh*t", and not take it any more.
> >
> > What is UML doing to trigger this?
>
> Beats the crap out of me. These things are very generic code from
> UML's point of view.
How does the preprocessed code look like around the definition
and the declaration + use of said function?
Try to do an:
make path/to/file.i
To see the preprocessed output.
Just in case we have some subtle things going on..
Sam
|  |