lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 29 Apr 2008 06:57:44 +0200
FromSam Ravnborg <>
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] fs/block_dev.c:I_BDEV() mustn't be inline
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:32:17PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:41:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So just removing the inline is simply not acceptable any more, since it 
> > just implies total and utter breakage of the compiler. At some point you 
> > just have to say: "That is sh*t", and not take it any more.
> > 
> > What is UML doing to trigger this? 
> 
> Beats the crap out of me.  These things are very generic code from
> UML's point of view.

How does the preprocessed code look like around the definition
and the declaration + use of said function?

Try to do an:
make path/to/file.i

To see the preprocessed output.

Just in case we have some subtle things going on..

	Sam


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-29 06:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008