Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:32:28 +0200 | | From | Seewer Philippe <> | | Subject | Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select' | |
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
[snip]
> how far would "if you DEPENDS on FOO, and FOO is =m, you can only be =m or =n" get us?
> or are there hidden traps on this?
> (the hard case is if a non-tristate DEPENDS on a tristate, but... that's a trap anyway)
I guess it depends on the (use-)case. But in general I'd like a system
like that, especially if it would spew out warnings and errors for cases
like the one mentioned.
|  |