![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > Ingo, why the heck is this hiding under arch/x86/ and not in > lib/Kconfig.debug where it belongs?> > x86: add optimized inlining > > If there are platforms that can't handle it, we can add a conditional > to lib/Kconfig.debug, but by default it should be made available > generically. > > Where did this original patch get posted for review and discussion? > > Tell me where!?!?! here, two months ago: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/3/122 i made it x86-only due to this FUD that went against it: "messing with a global #define in a way that the results on 24 architectures with 7 different releases of gcc would be unpredictable." ... as i saw no reason why this feature, which i found rather useful, should be delayed another year or so. I'd be more than happy to promote this feature back to lib/Kconfig.debug, sparc64 interest would make that a strong argument. and here is the pull request that i posted to lkml, with the full patch included as well: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/911104?page=last > The only references I see is where Stephen Rothwell complained that it > broke the powerpc build, and then on the git commit list when Linus > sucked this crud in. i think there must something wrong about your lkml feed. Ingo | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-27 08:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||