[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, boot protocol
    Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> + memcpy(&early_res[i], &early_res[i + 1],
    >> + (j - 1 - i) * sizeof(struct early_res));
    > nit: memcpy() shouldn't be used for overlapping copies. It happens to be
    > OK (for dst<src) in the kernel implementations. We hope.

    Definitely shouldn't be assumed. At one point in the distant past I had
    a ppc memcpy which would clobber a destination cacheline before reading
    the source, so source and dest within a cacheline's distance would be
    trouble, regardless of the direction. Arch-specific code which knows
    about the arch-specific details of memcpy might be safer, I guess, but
    its still fairly brittle.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-27 01:41    [W:0.036 / U:2.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site