Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:29:57 +0400 | | From | Evgeniy Polyakov <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4 | |
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote:
> The code changes are really minimal. And don't get too hung up on the
> internal name of the syscall. I think accept4 is more desriptive than
> paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality
> and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed.
> If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still
> be something completely different.
What about sigset there too?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
|  |