lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 25 Apr 2008 08:29:57 +0400
FromEvgeniy Polyakov <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4
Hi.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote:
> The code changes are really minimal.  And don't get too hung up on the
> internal name of the syscall.  I think accept4 is more desriptive than
> paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality
> and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed.
> If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still
> be something completely different.

What about sigset there too?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-25 06:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2008