Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:29:57 +0400 | From | Evgeniy Polyakov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4 |
| |
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote: > The code changes are really minimal. And don't get too hung up on the > internal name of the syscall. I think accept4 is more desriptive than > paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality > and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed. > If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still > be something completely different.
What about sigset there too?
-- Evgeniy Polyakov
| |