![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote: > The code changes are really minimal. And don't get too hung up on the > internal name of the syscall. I think accept4 is more desriptive than > paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality > and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed. > If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still > be something completely different. What about sigset there too? -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-25 06:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||