lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 25 Apr 2008 08:43:05 +0200
From"Michael Kerrisk" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4
On 4/25/08, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote:
>  > The code changes are really minimal.  And don't get too hung up on the
>  > internal name of the syscall.  I think accept4 is more desriptive than
>  > paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality
>  > and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed.
>  > If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still
>  > be something completely different.
>
>
> What about sigset there too?

Right.  That was what I was understanding that Alan referred to when
he was talking about paccept()


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-25 08:45    [W:0.929 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans