![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
At Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:51:58 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > > Hello. > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > No, I don't think input-pcspkr would be ever easily obsoleted by > > snd-pcsp. People definitely want a system without the sound subsystem > > but with a beep. > If you don't enable sound, then you > can't enable snd-pcsp, and so the > pcspkr can be enabled. Yeah, of course. Don't mix up with the argument about Kconfig dependency issues. I just reacted against your statement that input pcspkr driver will be obsoleted. > But if you have enabled the sound, > what's the use in not seeing the > snd-pcsp in the config? > Because most people already had > pcspkr enabled I guess, this just > reduces the availability of snd-pcsp > by an order of magnitude. And the > reason for that, is... ? I actually removed the dependency from snd-pcsp Kconfig again since this causes a dependency loop (at least, kbuild can't handle properly). But anyway, as mentioned in my previous post, snd-pcsp wouldn't be enabled on most of distros' kernels because it cannot be built together with input-pcspkr driver, unfortunately... Takashi | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-25 08:31 [W:0.499 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||