lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 25 Apr 2008 19:17:45 +0300
FromAdrian Bunk <>
SubjectRe: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:50:43AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER> > > >  /* Bitmask of physically existing CPUs */
> > > >  physid_mask_t phys_cpu_present_map;
> > > > +#endif
> > > >...> > > > > > Alexey noted that phys_cpu_present_map for Voyager and !Voyager also 
> > > have different types and suggested to make the Voyager one static 
> > > instead (additional renaming of the Voyager one also makes sense).
> > 
> > yep, done by the patch below.> > Actually, this isn't the right patch.  The point is not to avoid the
> symbol clash, it's to let voyager identify correctly that you have a
> leaking symbol.  In this case phys_cpu_present_map is exposed outside of
> SMP.  The correct fix (and one which sweeps op other storage for
> unnecessary symbols is this):> > James> > ---> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index c0c68c1..d68aa53 100644> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@>  #include <asm/mpspec.h>
>  #include <asm/apicdef.h>
> 
> +#ifdef CONIFG_X86_SMP
>...

tpyo  ;)

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-25 18:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2008