lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 24 Apr 2008 18:48:37 +0200
From"Michael Kerrisk" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
On 4/24/08, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > But this approach fixes just one of the interfaces. There are 7 or 8
> > other interfaces that need to solve the same problem. What about
> > those?
>
>
> Actually it seems to fix most of them.

Am I missingg something? How? There a number of system calls that
have neither a flags argument, nor another argument that we can
overload (as you propose with socket()). For those, we'd need new
system calls os sys_indirect().

> I accept Jakub's observation we
> need a "paccept()" or similar.

True, that would be nice.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-24 18:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2010