[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
    Hash: SHA1

    Alan Cox wrote:
    > Believe it or not we have the compute capability between us to not
    > accidentally reassign values we assigned to one thing to something else.

    Once again, this is not about assigned values. This is about the time
    before you get a value assigned. Not every experiment out there will
    have a value assigned before it starts development.

    But it really doesn't matter to me. I'm not the one you would introduce
    the problem. Patch is forthcoming.

    >> Oh really? You open a server socket, use fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC), and then
    >> accept().
    > And your behaviour just became OS specific....

    Not according to POSIX. If some OSes deliberately violate POSIX that's
    their problem. All POSIX OSes will have up to today return a new file
    descriptor without the close-on-exec flag set at all times. Just read
    the spec.

    - --
    ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-24 18:07    [W:0.042 / U:47.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site