![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote: > >> + if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END)) >> + return -1; > > ah, this explains the weird chunk in your other patch. Why this is not in x86_32? Please see my other mail "x86: endless page faults in mount_block_root for Linux 2.6", with problem without this check. -- Henry N. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-23 09:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||