lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Let SYSVIPC default to 'y'
On 24/04/2008, Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > SYSVIPC is a pretty crucial feature that I doubt very much if anyone
> except embedded people should even consider disabling - it simply breaks too
> much software for a Linux box to really be useful without it, for most
> purposes.
> > For that reason I find it quite odd that the feature defaults to 'No'
> currently. I really cannot see any reason why we wouldn't want this to
> default to 'Yes', so this patch changes the default by adding 'default y' to
> Kconfig.
> >
<...snip...>
>
> I am running up-to-date Kubuntu Hardy Heron, but...
>
> kevin@alekhine:~/linux/linux-2.6$ grep SYSVIPC .config
> # CONFIG_SYSVIPC is not set
>
> What software that would be in a standard install would be broken? I don't
> seem to notice anything...
>
> Not that I mind the default being changed - I just wonder if things on my
> box are broken and I just don't know it.
>

Well,
DOSEmu doesn't work without it.
SysOrb (http://www.sysorb.com/) doesn't work without it AFAIK.
IIRC, X had trouble in the past without it.
Anything that uses SysV shared memory, SysV message passing
(msgget(), msgsnd() etc..),
SysV semaphores (semget() etc), will have trouble.
In general, System V IPC is just used by many different programs...
Perhaps not any you run,
but it is pretty widely used.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-24 02:25    [W:2.439 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site