Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:21:04 -0400 | | From | Jeff Garzik <> | | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF | |
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Aik... We can do s/sff/tf/ and leave bmdma alone to avoid even more
> confusion but sff has meant tf base interface for quite some time now in
> libata and I think it'll be better to remember that sff is the new tf.
> Sorry about the mess.
This renaming was discussed at the time on lkml and linux-ide, the
patches and git pushes were CC'd, and I do not recall these complaints
being raised at the time.
At this point, it's too ingrained in libata. Another rename would IMO
just cause more needless churn.
Jeff
|  |