lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack
From
Date
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:55:19 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:48:58 +0200
> > tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer) wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:01:26PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > > cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack
> > > > >
> > > > > If cdrom commands are issued to a scsi drive in most cases the buffer
> > > > > will be
> > > > > filled via dma. This leads to bad stack corruption on non coherent
> > > > > platforms,
> > > > > because the buffers are neither cache line aligned nor is the size a
> > > > > multiple
> > > > > of the cache line size. Using kmalloced buffers avoids this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > > >---
> > > > > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 274
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > 1 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Eh... AFAICS this is only really useful in two of the cases converted.
> > > >
> > > > For all the other cases (<= 32 bytes), it is _far_ less complex, far
> > > > less code to simply communicate the additional alignment requirements to
> > > > the compiler.
> > > >
> > > > What about __attribute__ __aligned__? Was that tried?
> > >
> > > I used that while narrowing down the bug. But not only the alignment is
> > > important, but also size needs to be a multiple of the cache line size.
> > > Which means it needs to be 128 bytes for most SGI machines. That
> > > and the following in DMA-mapping.txt
> > >
> > > "This rule also means that you may use neither kernel image addresses
> > > (items in data/text/bss segments), nor module image addresses, nor
> > > stack addresses for DMA."
> > >
> > > let me choose the kmalloc() solution.
> >
> > Can we advertise such architecture's dma restrictions? For example, if
> > we can update dma_pad_mask and dma_alignment in request_queue,
> > blk_rq_map_kern uses a proper bounce buffer for such
> > architectures. Then we can avoid putting extra complexity in uppper
> > drivers such as cdrom.c
>
> That would work fine, if cdrom was then also updated to get rid of
> ->generic_packet() and use the regular queue transport instead. Which
> would be a VERY nice thing to do anyway, so I'd welcome the effort :-)

sr_packet calls ioctl so it works for SCSI at least?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-22 14:05    [W:0.188 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site