lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 21 Apr 2008 22:11:29 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> sure - but no need to be rude and mark it BROKEN when we've got this much 
>> better tool named "email". BROKEN is really just for cases where there's 
>> no-one willing to fix things.
>
> I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just trying to avoid putting an 
> unnecessary burden on testers and just let Kconfig know not to pick 
> this particular random path.  Obviously, Kconfig doesn't care, but 
> it's clear BROKEN has negative associations; besides, it really is 
> unnecessarily strong.
>
> Perhaps what we need is NORAND?

yep, i was thinking about CONFIG_BROKEN2 already :-)

then i came up with: CONFIG_NON_GENERIC. All code that can break a 
normal bootup should be marked with that. Such as CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y 
[panics on bootup] or CONFIG_EUROTECH_WDT=y [crashes on bootup] or 
CONFIG_SND_MTPAV [hangs on bootup] and the dozens of other config 
options i had to map when trying to bring up an allyesconfig kernel for 
the first time ;-)

auto-tests could then still build-test NON_GENERIC kernels but would not 
attempt to boot them up.

hm?

	Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-21 22:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008