[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: Self-snapshotting in Linux
    Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > Hi.
    > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 03:27 -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote:
    >> I guess there is the hardware / drivers issue. I would like to claim
    >> I've found hibernation to be reliable but unfortunately that's not
    >> 100% true. As you say, that's inherent to snapshotting on
    >> unvirtualised hardware - calling it snapshotting instead of
    >> hibernation wouldn't change anything.
    > On a particular set of hardware, it should be possible to make it 100%
    > reliable. If you've found bugs, please report them. We can only fix
    > issues if we know they exist.

    I already replied to Pavels similar comment - I had posted on Bugzilla.
    I guess it missed the right people because it started off in the wrong
    category. (The first symptom I reported was my 2.13Ghz cpu running at
    1Ghz after a sucessful hibernation cycle). At Rafaels request, I shall
    be retesting with the latest 2.6.25-rc kernel on Saturday. I look
    forward to getting it fixed - I know it should be possible because it's
    a regression.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-17 09:51    [W:0.020 / U:152.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site