Messages in this thread | | | From | Bodo Eggert <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 | Date | Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:56:43 +0200 |
| |
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 14 Apr 2008, at 13:46, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>>> (and under no-one I include the OOM killer for example!) >> >> The OOM killer can be configured and if the fs still uses too much >> memory >> then probably it's better to be killed/restarted with journaling >> support. >> The important here would be the kernel finally fixing the non-sync >> behavior >> when it clams to do so (see recent kernel threads). > > You don't get the point. Any process in the system can be using too > much memory and trigger the OOM killer even when the FS is behaving > just fine...
Just set /proc/$pid/oom_adj to -17.
| |