[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [bug] SLUB + mm/slab.c boot crash in -rc9
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christoph Lameter <> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> and the bug pattern seems to be memory corruption - not memory
>>> exhaustion.
>> SLUB does not do a memory allocation where it fails here but simply
>> accesses per cpu information that is expected to be already zeroed.
>>> i.e. we allocated RAM but it got corrupted after allocation.
>> In some situations we are screwing up the per cpu data handling on 32
>> bit x86? Adding Mike. This looks like the per cpu area overlaps with
>> something else?
> yep, that was my other theory - and i doubled CONFIG_NR_CPUS to reduce
> that chance.
> in hindsight ... that wont save us from any overlap, right?
> what's the best way to artificially increase the size of the allocated
> per cpu area? (say double it)
> Ingo

I don't know that there is a boot option. If modules are defined it
adds an extra 8k. The size is defined in include/linux/percpu.h

Otherwise define a really large per_cpu variable...?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-15 23:29    [W:0.096 / U:4.544 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site