Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:04:03 -0700 | | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | | Subject | Re: [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() | |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes:
> >
> > > Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address
> > > range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node
> > > configurations.
> >
> > Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> >
> > This is far better than the original change it replaces and which
> > I also objected to in review.
> >
>
> So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for
> 2.6.25?
the patch is wrong
YH
|  |