![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > > Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes: > > > > > Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address > > > range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node > > > configurations. > > > > Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> > > > > This is far better than the original change it replaces and which > > I also objected to in review. > > > > So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for > 2.6.25? the patch is wrong YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-15 09:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||