![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > For me it sounds like you just want to rename semaphores to some other > name that people don't use them for normal locking? Would it really be a good idea to give a synchronization concept that behaves exactly like a semaphore another name than "semaphore" ? The semaphore concept is well known and is taught in every computer science course. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-04-15 08:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||