lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Reporting bugs and bisection
    On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Al Viro wrote:

    > Real review of code in tree and patches getting into the tree.

    There is currently little incentive for developers to perform review.

    It's difficult work, and is generally not rewarded or recognized, except
    in often quite negative ways. There is a small handful of people who do a
    lot of review, but they are exceptional in various ways.

    OTOH, writing code is relatively simple, and is much more highly rewarded:

    - People tend to get paid to write kernel code, but not so much to review
    it.

    - Things like "who made the kernel" statistics and related articles ignore
    code review.

    - Creating new features is perceived as the highest form of contribution
    for general developers, and likely important as career currency
    (similar to the publish or perish model in the academic world).

    I don't know how to solve this, but suspect that encouraging the use of
    reviewed-by and also including it in things like analysis of who is
    contributing, selection for kernel summit invitations etc. would be a
    start. At least, better than nothing.


    - James
    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@namei.org>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-14 17:59    [W:0.022 / U:1.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site