lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc6 regression - hang on resume
From
Date
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 10:53 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2008-04-12 09:27:42, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 23:04 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2008-04-04 08:31:29, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 01:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The following report is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.24. Please verify if the issue is still present in the
> > > > > mainline.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10319
> > > > > Subject : 2.6.25-rc6 regression - hang on resume
> > > > > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
> > > > > Date : 2008-03-25 04:44 (10 days old)
> > > >
> > > > Yes. The machine resumes and display stays black using s2ram -f -p
> > > > (blindly typing reboot etc on keyboard does what is expected). However
> > > > display comes back on 2.6.24.
> > >
> > > Could you get us any debugging output from s2ram? Or maybe even strace
> > > it in both working and broken case, and comparing them? (You may want
> > > to disable randomization so that results are comparable).
> >
> > I did on 2.6.24
> >
> > strace -ff s2ram >s2ram24.trace 2>&1
> >
> > and .25
> >
> > ???strace -ff s2ram >s2ram25.trace 2>&1
> >
> > with the .24 bringing the display back and .25 not. Files are here
> >
> > http://nn7.de/debugging/s2ram24.trace.bz2
> > ???http://nn7.de/debugging/s2ram25.trace.bz2
>
> Hmm:
>
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:1b.0/irq
>
> contains 21 in one case and 22 in another... as do other
> interrupts. Is that expected? Can you post /proc/interrupts for both
> versions?

It might be that configs are slightly different - if you think this
gives a clue I will post them, but your discovery below looks promising:

> Hmm, big part of trace is:
>
> vm86old(0xb7f76c8c) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not
> implemented)
> vm86old(0xb7f76c8c) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not
> implemented)
>
> ...I wonder why we do it so many times?
>
> And here's the difference. .25 says:
>
> vm86old(0xb809ac8c) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not
> implemented)
> vm86old(0xb809ac8c) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not
> implemented)
> Error: something went wrong performing real mode call
> open("/sys/class/graphics",
> O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY|0x80000) = -1 ENOENT (No
> such file or directory)
> open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) = 6
> ioctl(6, KDGKBTYPE, 0xbfae8887) = 0
>
> ...can you perhaps add printf-s to s2ram to find out what changed?

OK, I searched for "something went wrong performing real mode call" in
the s2ram source and found this function:

int do_real_post(unsigned pci_device)
{
int error = 0;
struct LRMI_regs r;
memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r));
/* Several machines seem to want the device that they're POSTing in
here */
r.eax = pci_device;
/* 0xc000 is the video option ROM. The init code for each
option ROM is at 0x0003 - so jump to c000:0003 and start running
*/
r.cs = 0xc000;
r.ip = 0x0003;
/* This is all heavily cargo culted but seems to work */
r.edx = 0x80;
r.ds = 0x0040;
if (!LRMI_call(&r)) {
fprintf(stderr,
"Error: something went wrong performing real mode call\n");
error = 1;
}
return error;
}
which is obviously called from

int do_post(void)
{
struct pci_dev *p;
unsigned int c;
unsigned int pci_id;
int error;
pci_scan_bus(pacc);

for (p = pacc->devices; p; p = p->next) {
c = pci_read_word(p, PCI_CLASS_DEVICE);
if (c == 0x300) {
pci_id =
(p->bus << 8) + (p->dev << 3) +
(p->func & 0x7);
error = do_real_post(pci_id);
if (error != 0) {
return error;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
so either the graphics adapter is somehow not ready yet or a wrong
address is used for posting?

Do you already now have an idea? Or which things should I print out?

Soeren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-13 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site